CRAN Package Check Results for Package teal.modules.clinical

Last updated on 2024-07-22 20:55:56 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.9.1 31.12 289.56 320.68 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.9.1 25.91 208.18 234.09 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.9.1 259.99 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.9.1 381.09 OK
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.9.1 31.00 239.00 270.00 NOTE
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.9.1 43.11 273.58 316.69 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.9.1 21.60 267.01 288.61 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 0.9.1 81.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.9.1 160.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 0.9.1 30.00 234.00 264.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 0.9.1 95.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.9.1 154.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 0.9.1 39.00 293.00 332.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.9.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package anchors: split_choices.Rd: choices_selected template_coxreg_m.Rd: control_coxreg template_coxreg_u.Rd: control_coxreg tm_t_tte.Rd: data_extract_spec, coxph_pairwise, surv_timepoint, surv_time Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the package itself and the base packages. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64

Version: 0.9.1
Check: package dependencies
Result: NOTE Imports includes 24 non-default packages. Importing from so many packages makes the package vulnerable to any of them becoming unavailable. Move as many as possible to Suggests and use conditionally. Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 0.9.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Undeclared packages ‘emmeans’, ‘labeling’ in Rd xrefs Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang